Pendidikan Komparatif Indonesia dan Uruguay: Pendekatan, Metode, Evaluasi, Keterlibatan Siswa, Penggunaan Teknologi, dan Tantangannya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53299/jppi.v4i4.885Keywords:
komparatif pendidikan, pendidikan dasar Indonesia, pendidikan dasar UruguayAbstract
Pendidikan komparatif merupakan salah satu pendekatan yang digunakan untuk menganalisis perbedaan dan persamaan antara dua atau lebih sistem pendidikan di berbagai negara, dengan tujuan untuk meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan sistem pendidikan dasar yang ada di Indonesia dan pendidikan dasar yang ada di Uruguay. Fokus utama di dalam penelitian ini adalah dari segi pendekatan pedagogis, metode pengajaran, evaluasi efektivitas, keterlibatan siswa, penggunaan teknologi, dan tantangan yang dialami antara pendidikan dasar di Indonesia dan pendidikan dasar di Uruguay. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode studi literatur dengan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Uruguay memiliki sistem pendidikan yang lebih maju dalam hal penggunaan teknologi, keterlibatan siswa, dan evaluasi efektivitas pengajaran. Sedangkan Indonesia sedang berupaya dalam meningkatkan kualitas melalui kurikulum merdeka, namun masih mengalami beberapa tantangan dalam pelaksanaannya. Kesimpulannya, Indonesia dapat belajar dari praktik baik Uruguay untuk meningkatkan kualitas pendidikannya, terutama dalam konteks pengintegrasian teknologi dalam pembelajaran. Diharapkan penelitian ini dapat menjadi rujukan untuk mengidentifikasi peluang perbaikan pada siswa pendidikan dasar di Indonesia.
References
Aditya, A., & Mahendra, Y. (2023). Teacher Training and Professional Development in Implementing Indonesia’s Curriculum Reform. Journal of Teacher Education and Development, 21(4), 98–115.
Alvira, S. (2023). The Integration of Digital Devices in Education: A Study of Uruguayan Schools. Journal of Educational Technology, 20(2), 75–90.
Arif, R., & Wulandari, T. (2022). The Role of Urban Schools in Promoting Digital Literacy in Indonesia. Journal of Education and Technology Studies, 24(1), 99–115.
Arifin, Z. (2022). Cultural Influences on Teaching Practices in Indonesia. Journal of Comparative Education, 23(2), 56–73.
Fajri, S., Ulaini, N., & Susantri, M. (2023). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka pada Pembelajaran Sejarah. Kaganga: Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Dan Riset Sosial Humaniora, 6(2), 387–397.
Fauzi, R. (2022). Barriers to Implementing Technology in Rural Indonesian Schools. Journal of Educational Barriers and Innovation, 26(2), 35–48.
Ferrando, L. (2021). Plan Ceibal: Uruguay’s Educational Revolution. International Journal of Educational Technology, 23(1), 1–12.
Fowler, B., & Vegas, E. (2021). How England Implemented Its Computer Science Education Program. Center for Universal Education at The Brookings …, 1–13. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED610629.pdf
Gonzalez, P., & Perez, M. (2022). Digital Literacy and Student Performance in Uruguay: A Study of Plan Ceibal’s Outcomes. Journal of Technology and Education Development, 19(3), 78–94.
Gunawan, I., & Wibowo, A. (2022). The Impact of Digital Learning on Indonesian Education. Journal of Digital Education and Innovation, 28(2), 134–147.
Hartati, S., Wahyudi, W., & Suryadi, A. (2021). Implementation of Project-Based Learning in Rural Indonesian Schools. Educational Practices and Innovation, 14(3), 213–225.
Junaidi, A. (2022). Socioeconomic Barriers to Education in Indonesia: A Qualitative Study. International Journal of Educational Research, 17(2), 89–106.
Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2020). No Title. In Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Training Evaluation. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Lopez, M., & Martinez, J. (2021). Collaborative Learning and Technology in Uruguayan Schools: A Case Study. Education Technology Research and Development, 29(3), 45–66.
Muñoz, A. (2021). Enhancing Student Participation through Technology in Uruguay: Lessons from Plan Ceibal. . . International Journal of Educational Policy, 19(3), 67–85.
Muñoz, M. (ed. . (2020). Plan Ceibal 2020: Education innovation challenges in Uruguay. https://bit.ly/3CYl0Au
Nasution, R., & Fadilah, H. (2023). Bridging the Digital Divide in Indonesian Rural Schools. Journal of Digital Education, 25(2), 12–29.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Ramos, P. (2022). The Role of Plan Ceibal in Developing Collaborative Learning Skills in Uruguay. Educational Technology International, 15(3), 189–205.
Rodriguez, M. (2020). Integrating Technology in Primary Education: The Uruguayan Model. Technology in Education Journal, 15(3), 189–205.
Sari, D., & Kusumaningrum, R. (2022). The Role of Technology in Increasing Student Engagement in Rural Indonesian Schools. Journal of Rural Education, 22(1), 88–102.
Sari, R., & Kusumaningrum, A. (2022). Student Engagement in the Era of Independent Curriculum in Indonesia. Journal of Educational Innovation, 34(3), 123–140.
Silva, C. (2023). Pendidikan dan Tantangan Akses Teknologi di Indonesia dan Uruguay. Journal of Comparative Education, 35(2), 101–120.
Smith, J. (2023). Educational Assessment Practices in Indonesia: A Comparative Perspective. Journal of Education and Development, 18(3), 145–160.
Suryani, N., & Rahayu, D. (2021). Challenges in Implementing Project-Based Learning in Indonesia. Journal of Educational Practices, 30(4), 215–230.
Turner, L., & Finn, P. (2023). Technology and Student Engagement: A Comparative Study of Urban and Rural Schools in Indonesia. Journal of Comparative Education, 37(2), 109–126.
Widyastuti, E. (2021). Traditional vs. Modern Teaching Methods in Indonesian Education. Journal of Educational Methods, 32(4), 111–130.
Zhao, L. (2021). Sustaining Educational Reforms: The Case of Plan Ceibal in Uruguay. Journal of Educational Leadership and Policy, 25(3), 78–92.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Indonesia (JPPI)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
