Profil Keterampilan Berpikir Sistem Mahasiswa pada Materi Listrik Dinamis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53299/jagomipa.v6i2.4268Keywords:
Keterampilan Berpikir Sistem, Listrik Dinamis, MahasiswaAbstract
Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh pentingnya keterampilan berpikir sistem dalam memahami konsep listrik dinamis yang bersifat kompleks dan saling terhubung, sementara kemampuan tersebut belum berkembang secara optimal pada mahasiswa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan profil keterampilan berpikir sistem mahasiswa pada materi listrik dinamis yang dilaksanakan di beberapa perguruan tinggi di Nusa Tenggara Barat (NTB) dengan menggunakan metode deskriptif kuantitatif. Instrumen penelitian berupa soal pilihan ganda beralasan yang mengukur tujuh indikator keterampilan berpikir sistem, yaitu mengeksplorasi berbagai perspektif, mempertimbangkan masalah, mengenali sistem, mempertahankan batas sistem, membedakan dan mengukur elemen, mengidentifikasi hubungan, serta mencirikan hubungan. Teknik analisis data dilakukan menggunakan persentase. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 73% mahasiswa berada pada kategori rendah, 17% pada kategori sedang, dan tidak terdapat mahasiswa yang berada pada kategori tinggi. Capaian mahasiswa lebih dominan pada indikator mengenali sistem, sedangkan kemampuan pada indikator yang berkaitan dengan hubungan dan batas sistem masih relatif rendah. Dengan demikian, disimpulkan bahwa keterampilan berpikir sistem mahasiswa masih dominan rendah. Selanjutnya perlu penelitian lanjutan terkait pengembangan bahan ajar dan strategi pembelajaran yang berorientasi pada keterampilan berpikir sistem sangat diperlukan untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konseptual mahasiswa. Selain itu, studi lanjutan juga perlu mengeksplorasi faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi perkembangan keterampilan tersebut pada berbagai konteks pembelajaran.
References
Assaraf, O. B.-Z., & Orion, N. (2005).
Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 518–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20061
Assaraf, O. B.-Z., & Orion, N. (2010). System thinking skills at the elementary school level. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 540–563. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20351
Arnold, R. D., & Wade, J. P. (2015).
A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach. Procedia Computer Science, 44, 669–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.050
Arnold, R, D., & Wade, J. A Complete Set of Sytem Thinking Skills. 27th Annual INCOSE International Symposium (IS 2017), https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2017.00433.x
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.
Chi, M. T. H., et al. (2012). Differentiating conceptual understanding from problem solving. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 177–190.
Chen, Y, C., Wilson, K., Lin, H. (2019). Identifying The Challenging characteristics of systems thinking encountered by undergraduate students in chemistry problem-solving of gas laws. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(3), https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00070D
Danish, J. A., Saleh, A., Andrade, A., & Bryan, B. (2020). Observing complex systems thinking in the context of inquiry-based learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(4–5), 1–44.
Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251–19257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116
Eisenberg, R. (2025). Electric circuits and systems (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
Etkina, E., Planinsic, G., & Van Heuvelen, A. (2019). College physics: Explore and apply (2nd ed.). Pearson.
Habibah, H., Lidya, N., Suryadi, A. (2024). The Effect of Pjbl Stem Learning on Students' Systems Thinking Skills on Alternative Energy Materials. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 12 (3). https://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v12i3.18969
Hmelo-Silver, C, E., Jordan, R, C., Eberbach, C., Sinha, S. (2017). System Learning with Conceptual Representation: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Instructional Science, 45 (1), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9392
Jegstad, K. M., & Sinnes, A. T. (2018). Chemistry teaching for the future: A model for secondary chemistry education for sustainable development. International Journal of Science Education, 40(6), 655–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1441280
Kautz, C. H., Heron, P. R. L., Loverude, M. E., & McDermott, L. C. (2005). Student understanding of the ideal gas law, Part I: A macroscopic perspective. American Journal of Physics, 73(11), 1055–1063.
Kumar, A. (2021). Fundamentals of electrical engineering. McGraw-Hill.
Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdés, G. (2017). Science and language for English language learners in relation to Next Generation Science Standards. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223–233.
Mahaffy, J. M., Matlin, S. A., Whalen, J. M., & Holme, T. A. (2022). Examining undergraduate students’ systems thinking competency through a problem scenario in the context of climate change education. Environmental Education Research, 28(8), 1172–1191.
Mambrey, V., Schreiber, C., & Schmiemann, P. (2020). Young students’ reasoning about systems thinking. Education Sciences, 10(11), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110310
Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in Systems: A Primer. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
Pepperell, S., & Millar, R. (2020). Secondary students’ understanding of electric circuits: The role of analogies. Physics Education, 55(6), 1–9.
Quintela, P. (2009). Circuit theory and applications. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 56(3), 123–130.
Reif, F. (2008). Applying cognitive science to education: Thinking and learning in scientific and other complex domains. MIT Press.
Rojas, F. (2022). Electrical circuit analysis: Theory and practice. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 59(2), 145–160.
Susilawati, E., Hamidah, I., Rustaman, N., Liliawati, W. (2025). Logical Reasoning Profile of Student Teachers in Indonesia, EASE Letters, 4 (2),
Sweeney, L. B., & Sterman, J. D. (2007). Thinking about systems: Student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems. System Dynamics Review, 23(2–3), 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.366
Tenney, F. H. (2023). Introduction to electric circuits. Wiley.
Trötsch, J., & Schuler, S. (2021). Systems thinking in science education: A systematic review. Research in Science Education, 51, 1–27.
UNESCO. (2014). Shaping the future we want: UN decade of education for sustainable development (2005–2014). UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO Publishing.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JagoMIPA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
