Pedagogical People Analytics Berbasis Artefak untuk Analisis Konseptual pada Pembelajaran Konfigurasi Elektron
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53299/jagomipa.v6i2.4331Keywords:
learning analytics, Pedagogical People Analytics, artefak pembelajaran, perkembangan konseptual, konfigurasi electronAbstract
Pembelajaran kimia masih menghadapi tantangan dalam mengungkap proses berpikir siswa secara mendalam, terutama pada materi abstrak seperti konfigurasi elektron. Selama ini, learning analytics lebih banyak berorientasi pada data jejak perilaku belajar sehingga perkembangan pemahaman konseptual siswa belum tergambarkan secara utuh. Kondisi tersebut menunjukkan pentingnya pendekatan yang mampu merepresentasikan proses berpikir siswa melalui bukti pembelajaran yang autentik. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan dan menerapkan kerangka Pedagogical People Analytics berbasis artefak pembelajaran untuk menganalisis perkembangan konseptual siswa. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif interpretatif dengan melibatkan 32 siswa kelas X6 di SMAN 7 Tangerang Selatan yang dipilih menggunakan teknik purposive sampling pada materi konfigurasi elektron. Data dikumpulkan melalui artefak pembelajaran siswa pada setiap tahap pembelajaran dan dianalisis menggunakan pengodean terbuka, aksial, dan selektif. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa perkembangan konseptual siswa berlangsung melalui empat tahap, yaitu terfragmentasi, negosiasi makna, stabilisasi konsep, dan refleksi pemahaman. Artefak pembelajaran juga mampu memberikan gambaran autentik mengenai perkembangan proses berpikir siswa secara bertahap. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa Pedagogical People Analytics dapat menjadi pendekatan yang lebih kontekstual dan relevan secara pedagogis dalam mengungkap perkembangan konseptual siswa pada pembelajaran kimia.
References
Alzahrani, A. S., Tsai, Y. S., Iqbal, S., Marcos, P. M. M., Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., Kloos, C. D., Aljohani, N., & Gasevic, D. (2023). Untangling connections between challenges in the adoption of learning analytics in higher education. In Education and Information Technologies (Vol. 28, Number 4). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11323-x
Edelsbrunner, P. A., & Hofer, S. I. (2023). Unraveling the relation between representational competence and conceptual knowledge across four samples from two different countries. Frontiers in Education, 8(April), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1046492
Gasevic, D., Tsai, Y.-S., Dawson, S., & Pardo, A. (2019). How do we start? An approach to learning analytics adoption in higher education. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 36(4), 342–353. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-02-2019-0024
Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 542–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533
Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y. K. (2020). Utilising learning analytics to support study success in higher education: a systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1961–1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09788-z
Knight, S., Buckingham Shum, S., & Littleton, K. (2014). Epistemology, Assessment, Pedagogy: Where Learning Meets Analytics in the Middle Space. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(2), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2014.12.3
Long, P. D., & Siemens, G. (2014). Penetrare La Nebbia: Tecniche Di Analisi Per L’Apprendimento Penetrating the Fog: Analytics in Learning and Education. TD Tecnologie Didattiche, 22(3), 132–137.
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed. In Pearson. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1475756/
Marler, J. H., & Boudreau, J. W. (2017). An evidence-based review of HR Analytics. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1244699
Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2012). Learning Through Constructing Representations in Science: A framework of representational construction affordances. International Journal of Science Education, 34(17), 2751–2773. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.626462
Rasmussen, T., & Ulrich, D. (2015). Learning from practice: How HR analytics avoids being a management fad. Organizational Dynamics, 44(3), 236–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2015.05.008
Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2020). Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1355
Roski, M., Sebastian, R., Ewerth, R., Hoppe, A., & Nehring, A. (2024). Learning analytics and the Universal Design for Learning (UDL): A clustering approach. Computers and Education, 214(March), 105028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105028
Shibani, A., Knight, S., & Buckingham Shum, S. (2022). Questioning learning analytics? Cultivating critical engagement as student automated feedback literacy. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 326–335. https://doi.org/10.1145/3506860.3506912
Shibani, A., Knight, S., & Shum, B. (2020). Educator Perspectives on Learning Analytics in Classroom Practice.
Shum, S. B., & Crick, R. D. (2016). Learning Analytics for 21st Century Competencies. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(2), 6–21. https://learning-analytics.info/journals/index.php/JLA/article/view/5082%5Cnhttps://learning-analytics.info/journals/index.php/JLA/article/download/5082/5584
Shum, S. B., Ferguson, R., & Martinez-maldonado, R. (2019). Human-Centred Learning Analytics. 6(2), 1–9.
Siemens, G., & Baker, R. S. J. D. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication and collaboration. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 252–254. https://doi.org/10.1145/2330601.2330661
Taber, K. S. (2005). Learning quanta: Barriers to stimulating transitions in student understanding of orbital ideas. Science Education, 89(1), 94–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20038
Taber, K. S. (2013). Revisiting the chemistry triplet: Drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledge and the psychology of learning to inform chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3rp00012e
van den Heuvel, S., & Bondarouk, T. (2017). The rise (and fall?) of HR analytics: A study into the future application, value, structure, and system support. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness, 4(2), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-03-2017-0022
Viberg, O., Cukurova, M., Feldman-Maggor, Y., Alexandron, G., Shirai, S., Kanemune, S., Wasson, B., Tømte, C., Spikol, D., Milrad, M., Coelho, R., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2025). What Explains Teachers’ Trust in AI in Education Across Six Countries? International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 35(3), 1288–1316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00433-x
Viberg, O., Hatakka, M., Bälter, O., & Mavroudi, A. (2018). The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 89(July), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.027
Vosniadou, S. (2013). International handbook of research on environmental education. Choice Reviews Online, 51(01), 51-0243-51–0243. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.51-0243
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JagoMIPA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
