Asesmen Korelasional Agensi Siswa melalui Faktor Praktik Pedagogis dan Asesmen Formatif

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53299/jppi.v6i4.5170

Keywords:

Agensi Siswa, Asesmen Formatif, Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis hubungan Teacher-Centeredness dan Perceived Benefits of Formative Assessment terhadap Student Agency murid sekolah menengah atas. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain survei. Sampel penelitian terdiri dari 450 siswa kelas X dan XI dari 10 sekolah di 4 provinsi yang dipilih menggunakan teknik simple random sampling. Instrumen penelitian berupa kuesioner skala Likert 5 poin yang mengukur tiga variabel utama. Data dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan uji korelasi Rank Spearman. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa praktik pembelajaran berpusat pada guru masih cukup dominan (M = 3,10; SD = 0,756), sementara persepsi siswa tentang manfaat asesmen formatif berada pada tingkat tertinggi (M = 3,75; SD = 0,830), dan agensi siswa berada pada tingkat sedang (M = 3,45; SD = 0,633) yang masih perlu ditingkatkan. Uji korelasi menunjukkan hubungan negatif yang signifikan antara Teacher-Centeredness dengan Student Agency (r = -0,598; p < 0,01), yang berarti semakin tinggi praktik pembelajaran berpusat pada guru, semakin rendah agensi siswa. Sebaliknya, terdapat hubungan positif yang kuat antara Perceived Benefits of Formative Assessment dengan Student Agency (r = 0,719; p < 0,01), yang berarti bahwa siswa yang merasakan manfaat asesmen formatif cenderung memiliki tingkat agensi yang lebih tinggi. Penelitian selanjutnya dapat menguji secara empiris efektivitas intervensi pedagogis yang mengintegrasikan pengurangan praktik pembelajaran berpusat pada guru dan penguatan asesmen formatif dalam meningkatkan agensi murid melalui desain intervensi terkontrol, serta mengeksplorasi faktor kontekstual yang berpotensi memoderasi hubungan antar variable.

References

Adawiyah, S. R., & Haolani, A. (2021). Kajian Teoritis Penerapan Self-Assessment Sebagai Alternatif Asesmen Formatif di Masa Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.36312/jime.v7i3.2307

Arrafii, M. A. (2021). Indonesian teachers’ conceptions of values and dimensions of assessment practice: The effect of teachers’ characteristics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 98, 103245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103245

Arstorp, A.-T., & Svendsen, A. C. (2026). Between passivity and autonomy: students’ agentic space and digital agency in Norwegian lower secondary education. PRACTICE, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/25783858.2026.2706168

Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2023). The Effect of Learning-Centred Leadership and Teacher Trust on Teacher Professional Learning: Evidence from a Centralised Education System. Professional Development in Education, 49(5), 925–937. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1879234

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807

BSKAP. (2025). Panduan Pembelajaran dan Asesmen.

Burhanuddin, & Arrafii, M. A. (2023). Unfolding the typology and quality of the learner agency practices in the teachers’ implementation of the 2013 curriculum in Indonesia: the normalisation process theory perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24(4), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09806-0

Campbel, S. (2020). Education and Curriculum Reform: The Impact They Have On Learning. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 3(2), 1074–1082. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i2.1036

Cook-Sather, A. (2020). Student voice across contexts: Fostering student agency in today’s schools. Theory Into Practice, 59(2), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1705091

Costa Akoyt, M. (2024). Formative assessment in Timor-Leste: teachers’ perception and practice. International Journal of Educational Innovation and Research, 3(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.31949/ijeir.v3i1.7243

Fletcher, A. K. (2024). Self-assessment as a student-agentic zone of proximate competence development. Educational Review, 76(4), 956–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2022.2103520

Hambali, A. (2025). Diversifikasi Kurikulum dalam Meningkatkan Minat dan Bakat Mahasiswa Prodi PGMI di STAI Al Anwar Sarang Rembang. IAIN Kediri.

Haryono, A. K., & Sheridan, L. (2025). From Silence to Agency: Reframing Indonesian Postgraduates’ Educational Struggles in the United Kingdom (UK). ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 40(2), E06. https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v40i2.7454

Hu, X., & Hennebry‐Leung, M. (2026). The Development of L2 Selves Among Chinese Early Adolescent Learners of English in Student‐ and Teacher‐Centred Contexts: A Person‐in‐Context Relational View. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.70100

Hunaepi, H., & Suharta, I. G. P. (2024). Transforming Education in Indonesia: The Impact and Challenges of the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum. Path of Science, 10(6), 5026–5039. https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.105-31

Jones, B., Nelson, J., & Gerzon, N. (2025, November 7). Using Conversations to Cultivate a Collaborative Learning Culture. Https://Csaa.Wested.Org/Using-Conversations-to-Cultivate-a-Collaborative-Learning-Culture/.

Kurniawati, E., & Rindrayani, S. R. (2025). Pendekatan Kuantitatif dengan Penelitian Survei : Studi Kasus dan Implikasinya. SOSIAL : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan IPS, 3(1), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.62383/sosial.v3i1.596

Lee, E. (2025). An Integrative Research Review on Formative Assessment Practices in South Korean EFL Contexts. English Teaching, 80(2), 103–133. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.80.2.202506.103

Li, J., & Yongqi Gu, P. (2024). Formative assessment for self-regulated learning: Evidence from a teacher continuing professional development programme. System, 125, 103414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103414

Louie, N. (2020). Agency Discourse and the Reproduction of Hierarchy in Mathematics Instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 38(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1677664

Luo, W., & Lim, S. Q. W. (2024). Perceived formative assessment and student motivational beliefs and self-regulation strategies: a multilevel analysis. Educational Psychology, 44(3), 284–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2024.2354686

Makkonen, R., & Jaquest, K. (2020). The association between teachers’ use of formative assessment practices and students’ use of self-regulated learning strategies .

Mameli, C., Grazia, V., & Molinari, L. (2020). Agency, responsibility and equity in teacher versus student-centred school activities: A comparison between teachers’ and learners’ perceptions. Journal of Educational Change, 21(2), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09366-y

Midyett, C., & Gerzon, N. (2025, May 20). Redefining the Student Role in Classroom Assessment: Policies and Practices to Strengthen Learner Agency. Https://Csaa.Wested.Org/Redefining-the-Student-Role-in-Classroom-Assessment-Policies-and-Practices-to-Strengthen-Learner-Agency/#genesis-Nav-Primary.

Mitchell, B., & Buntic, C. G. (2023). Global Trends in Curriculum Reform and Development. Curriculum and Teaching, 38(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.7459/ct/38.1.03

Nieminen, J. H., & Hannula, J. (2026). Student partnership in mathematics assessment: fostering student agency. ZDM – Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-026-01791-7

Parmigiani, D., Nicchia, E., Pario, M., Murgia, E., Radović, S., & Ingersoll, M. (2026). Self‐ and peer‐assessment in upper secondary schools. A quasi‐experimental study to investigate the educational effectiveness of formative assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 52(2), 1134–1158. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.70056

Patterson, C., & O’Brien, G. (2023). Cultivating a schoolwide pedagogy: Achievements and challenges of shifting teacher learning on thinking. Professional Development in Education, 49(5), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1879221

Ramadhani, D. P. (2021). Analisis Penerapan Asesmen Formatif dalam Pembelajaran IPA dan Fisika: Literatur Review. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 11(2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v11i2.172

Rosa, A. T. R., Nani, N., Virtha, W., Rusmana, N., & Nuraeni, Y. (2026). Model Pembelajaran Mendalam Berbasis Student Agency untuk Menguatkan Karakter Siswa Sekolah Dasar. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 9(2), 1760–1764. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v9i2.10547

Usher, E., & Ford, C. J. (2022). Social Cognitive Theory and Personal Agency. In Social Cognitive Theory and Personal Agency. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781138609877-REE48-1

Yu, E. C., & Andrade, H. (2026). Supporting metacognition through formative assessment. Theory Into Practice, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2026.2714721

Yulifah, Y., Maulina, Y., Novasari, Y., Nisa, Z., Ikrima, Z., & Susanti, M. M. E. (2025). Analisis Problematika Proses Pembelajaran di Tingkat Sekolah Dasar dalam Menunjang Keberhasilan Pembelajaran di Kelas. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Indonesia (JPPI), 5(3), 1645–1656. https://doi.org/10.53299/jppi.v5i3.1659

Downloads

Published

2026-10-06

How to Cite

Amelia, D., Dewi, L., & Fathiraini, N. (2026). Asesmen Korelasional Agensi Siswa melalui Faktor Praktik Pedagogis dan Asesmen Formatif. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Indonesia (JPPI), 6(4), 3084–3096. https://doi.org/10.53299/jppi.v6i4.5170